Skip to main content

The Strange Career of M. Night Shyamalan

Let's go back to the late 90's, when a new young director burst onto the scene in late summer with a film that would go on to be an unexpected blockbuster and a critical smash.

I'm talking about The Sixth Sense, and its director, M. Night Shyamalan. The movie shot the director into the limelight, both for his talent and his mysterious nature.

His follow-up--Unbreakable--was a modest hit, but he roared back with his second smash hit Signs.

Then things started to go wrong.

First, his movie The Village was a huge let-down for fans, and was also the center of a plagiarism case. A young adult author claimed Shyamalan had ripped off her novel, and if you read the novel, you could see that she had a pretty good case on her hands.

Then came the bomb to end all bombs--Lady in the Water.

Not only was the film a letdown on all fronts, it also solidified Shyamalan's high opinion of myself. Personally, it was the moment when I decided I was giving up on a filmmaker I used to admire.

Spoiler Alert! (If you're actually interested in seeing Lady in the Water, and I would highly advise against it.)

Shyamalan cast himself as a savior figure in the movie. Upon further investigation, you'll find that Shyamalan casts himself in small yet crucial roles in ALL his films.

I was starting to wonder if maybe this guy was just another failed actor whose swelling ego finally got the best of him.

Once The Happening came out, a bomb even bigger that Lady..., Shyamalan was worse than a director on a losing streak--he was completely irrelevant.

When your third comeback film doesn't incite a comeback, you have to wonder when the guy is going to throw in the towel.

This summer, however, Shyamalan seems to be moving his career into a slightly different direction.

He's taken on directing The Last Airbender, a more conventional summer blockbuster. It's sure to be at least a modest hit at the box office, and there's talk that Shyamalan is reuniting with his old lightning rod Bruce Willis, as well as Gwenyth Paltrow and Bradley Cooper for his next movie.

So will a big budget hit be enough to give him permission to go back to making introspective vanity projects?

Let's hope he goes even further, back to his root's roots. I think it's possible.

After all, if there's one thing this guy is good at, it's surprising people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making