I was trying to formulate why exactly this Albee situation bothers me so much, aside from the fact that it’s just pure insanity to have a dead playwright’s estate not only make money on that person’s work after they’re dead (Yes, I’m aware this is how estates work, but I still find it ludicrous)—but to also assert how a playwright would have felt about the casting of a particular production on the basis that they’re somehow “protecting” the work. Aside from all that—what bothers me is this: Why are we discussing “believability” when it comes to casting in theater? When you walk into a theater, aren’t you asked to suspend disbelief? Aren’t you asked to look at half a kitchen and pretend it’s a full kitchen that’s attached to a house that sits in a neighborhood somewhere? When you see a production of “King Lear” and it’s set in a supermarket and everyone is wearing uniforms, aren’t you being asked to believe in the duality of what the text says and what the prod...
Musings on Pop Culture and Other Things to Rant About