Skip to main content

On the Hurt Locker

Some quick notes:

1) I thought it was a fantastic idea having bigger names have smaller roles, and have the leads be relatively unknown.

2) I love that I learned things. So many people are wondering why this Iraq movie worked when so many aren't. I think it's because in the others we're being talked to rather than exposed to educated. Plus, I don't think you can take away from the fact that almost the entire movie was set in Iraq. In movies like Stop-Loss, Rendition, Lions for Lambs, and The Lucky Ones we're learning about the after-effects of the war, the returning vets, and the politics, but we're not seeing the actual experience, and I have to think it's because studios--even independent ones--don't want to make that movie. Well, here's someone who did and it's a much better movie for it.

3) A lot has been said about the movie being directed by a woman. Some have even said "It took a woman to make a good Iraq movie." I don't think it necessarily took a woman. I think it took a person who was interested in making a good movie that deals with a political issue rather than a movie that deals with a political issue and might have one or two things people actually want in a movie.

4) I think the great thing about this movie is that even though I didn't find it to be as terrific as a lot of other people did, I think it's great that it's going to help other filmmakers make movies about this that actually work. I feel like up until now everyone was just groping around in the dark, and now here's someone, Kathryn Bigelow, saying--This is what you have to do.

5) Final note: The screenwriter of this movie, Mark Boal, also wrote "In the Valley of Elah" which I believe is the second best movie about the Iraq war I've seen. That means this guy needs to be working much, much more, because he has this shit down.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making