First read this--http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/10/15/willingham.juror/index.html.
Now, can someone explain to me why it seems like Texas has decided they don't need to follow the rules the rest of the country does? Why do we allow this state to carry on its trigger-happy, fry-first-ask-questions-later ways?
The New Yorker did a terrific article about this case, where it was clear that there was a blood-thirst motivation going on that was nothing short of disturbing.
I truly feel bad for this juror, but at the same time, I'd like to ask her why she felt like it was okay for her to vote guilty and essentially play God if she's so worried about what God's going to think of her because of it.
Why isn't it considered murder when a political figure goes after an innocent man for ulterior motives? Will Perry ever be prosecuted?
I want to know why this is so self-contained. Why don't these people have to answer to a higher court?
And if this isn't a good enough example for overturning the death penalty, I'm not sure what is.
Now, can someone explain to me why it seems like Texas has decided they don't need to follow the rules the rest of the country does? Why do we allow this state to carry on its trigger-happy, fry-first-ask-questions-later ways?
The New Yorker did a terrific article about this case, where it was clear that there was a blood-thirst motivation going on that was nothing short of disturbing.
I truly feel bad for this juror, but at the same time, I'd like to ask her why she felt like it was okay for her to vote guilty and essentially play God if she's so worried about what God's going to think of her because of it.
Why isn't it considered murder when a political figure goes after an innocent man for ulterior motives? Will Perry ever be prosecuted?
I want to know why this is so self-contained. Why don't these people have to answer to a higher court?
And if this isn't a good enough example for overturning the death penalty, I'm not sure what is.
Comments
Post a Comment