Skip to main content

Moderated Blogs

I recently posted an article on Salon.com insinuating (okay, outright stating) that everyone on the site was old.

The title was meant to grab some attention (which it did) but it also posed a question that I very much wanted answered.

I received a lot of comments, but none of them answered my question. Most people were just putting down a quick quip or ignoring what I was saying entirely so they could state a completely different point.

Last night I was looking on another website where an article had been posted about an athlete's bad behavior. Of the hundreds of people who commented on the article, I could only find about ten people who actually responded to the topic of the article. Some people weren't even discussing anything related to the athlete or to sports itself. These weren't spammers either. These were (seemingly sane) people who took the time to read an article (I'm assuming) and then write something completely off-topic.

This brings me to my point:

Wouldn't it be nice if there were a moderator on certain websites for blog comments?

I'm not talking about a censor--just someone to do what a moderator would do in a political debate: Point out when a comment has nothing to do with the post it's being attached to.

"I'm sorry, but your comment has nothing to do with this post."

Wouldn't that be nice?

It would keep the weirdos at bay.
It would promote more intelligent comments, which would in turn promote better conversations regarding articles posted.
It would eliminate having to sift through pages upon pages of comments to find out if anybody actually directly responded to what you write on your blog.

Thoughts?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know ...
42 comments
Read more

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyon...
7 comments
Read more

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making...
Post a Comment
Read more