Skip to main content

Should Journalists Have Opinions?

This Saturday, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert will be joining forces in Washington DC at the Rally to Restore Sanity, but not everyone will be in attendance.

Today's news reported that NPR has banned any of its employees from attending the rally.  Other news organizations are allowing their employees to attend the rally, but not participate in any of the events, sign petitions, or donate money.

NPR responded by saying that they're instituting the ban to preserve their journalistic neutrality.  Some journalists are countering by saying that it's no longer realistic to expect that journalists not have a bias in the age of blogging and pundits clogging up the airwaves.

Even as I was typing out the title for this piece, I thought to myself--What am I saying?  Of course journalists have opinions, and of course they should be able to.  It's just a question of how good they are at hiding those opinions.

Nowadays, is there even a point?

Everybody knows which way the major news networks lean--MSNBC and CNN skew to the left, Fox News goes to the right.  Even newspapers and magazines often wear their political affiliations on their sleeves.

Still, I admire NPR for attempting to keep their journalists unbiased, but is barring them from attending a rally the way to go about doing that?  Isn't it an infringement upon their right to lead private lives outside of their careers?  Plus, let's be honest, it's pretty easy to see that NPR has a more left-leaning slant.  Trying to cover it up by barring employees from going to a rally that's merely attempting to satirize political extremists seems, well, the phrase "methinks they doth protest too much" comes to mind.

Since it seems impossible to continue the antiquated image of the "perfect journalist," maybe it's better for journalists to just come right out and let readers and viewers know where they stand.

And if they stand for a little extra sanity in the world, what's wrong with that?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know ...

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyon...

The Community and The Hypnotist

  Two years ago, I started interviewing people in the theater world about the problems within that community. All the subjects of the interviews remained anonymous to encourage people to speak directly and plainly without worrying that there would be consequences down the line. (Of course, even then, some people felt like outing themselves and getting in hot water, but we're going to leave that water under another bridge.) When I decided it was time to bring the series to a close, it was partly because I thought it had run its course, and partly because I had a new topic I wanted to tackle. While I've had my issues with theater and the people who do it, I've never felt like I didn't belong there, whereas from the moment I came out, I've never truly felt like a part of the gay community. To be clear, that probably has way more to do with me than the community, but it's something I wanted to explore, and I knew how I wanted to do it. The theater interviews were al...