Skip to main content

The Cool Council

The other day I saw a friend put up a status on Facebook about watching the Mariah Carey cinematic trainwreck Glitter.

I immediately messaged him.

"Why are you watching Glitter? Do you need a reason to put out your own eyes and/or lose faith in humanity?"

I received the following reply:

"Um Glitter is awesome. It's so hysterically bad that it's good. Get with it, Kev."

Wait, did I miss something?

I understand the idea of camp value and all of that, but I began to wonder who decides what transcends from trashy to tops.

Who makes the call that something is "so bad it's good?"

I realize time is a factor, but how much time?

For example, will the Mark Wahlberg remake of Planet of the Apes ever be considered "a riot--so horrific it's TERrific." Will Gigli ever be shown at midnight showings with audiences yelling lines back at the screen? Decades from now, will it be a tradition to watch Reindeer Games every Christmas Eve?

(Perhaps a bigger question is, why is Ben Affleck in so many bad movies?)

In my mind, I imagine a group of people wearing sunglasses and robes--like George Carlin in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure. (Another so-ridiculous-it's-amazing film.)

I see these people sitting at a long table, reviewing hours upon hours of awful movies and determining if they have that extra something that makes them worthy of being a hipster's Facebook status.

Battlefield Earth? No, not quotable enough. Plus they spent too much money on it.

Corky Romano? Yes, because if you're stoned, it's brilliant. The cookie line alone is so ingrained into the lexicon that most people probably don't even know what it's from.

Dunston Checks In? Not yet, but give it a few years, and perhaps it will age badly enough to be a viable candidate.

Wouldn't it be so much simpler if there actually was a governing cultural body such as this one? Then they could put out a newsletter, and we all could keep track of what it is we're now allowed to find mildly amusing at 3am while we're either drunk, half-awake, or both.

"Hey Rob, the Cool Council says Can't Buy Me Love is now an 80's classic. I guess we should go buy it on DVD and start memorizing it now."

Instead, we're all left to develop our own opinions and pretend those opinions have always existed, all the while mocking those who can't keep up.

It's a little like 1984, except now Big Brother is now a film major who dropped out of school after only taking two classes.

The mere thought of it is so sad, I'm thinking of going home and watching Fight Club just to cheer myself up.

...That's still cool, right?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making