Skip to main content

I Don't Blame Charlie Sheen

In the wake of CBS deciding to suspend production on the hit television show Two and a Half Men because of the erractic behavior of its star, Charlie Sheen, there are a lot of people taking shots at the troubled actor.

This isn't helped by the fact that Sheen seems to show absolutely no remorse for his behavior, and even went on a radio show to blast CBS and the producer of his show for using him to make money and then disposing of him.

I certainly don't defend Sheen's behavior, but I think it's important to point out that the network and the producers are, in fact, to blame here as well--the same way enablers contribute to addiction, these people contributed to the monster that has become Charlie Sheen.

It's understandable to keep a show going after the first or second incident of violence, drug abuse, felonies, and/or overall poor behavior, but CBS has backed Sheen for far too long, and I have a feeling he isn't far off when he says it's about how much money the network was making on him.

Rather than replace him with another actor, CBS did polls to see if people cared that Sheen was destroying his life and making the lives of the people he works with a living nightmare. The response? Nobody cared.

That's right. The audience for Two and a Half Men were perfectly content with watching a violent criminal make jokes every week so they could get a half hour of what most would consider poorly written and badly acted television. It doesn't surprise me. The show is the televised equivalent of fast food. The people who watch it don't want to think about Sheen's indiscretions. They just want to hear a few lousy punchlines and then go to bed.

Well, shame on them too. Don't those people have children? Don't they realize that we've created a celebrity culture without repercussions? What does that say to the next generation? Become famous, or rich, or powerful and you can do whatever you want?

How many of us would have made it to the fifth or sixth transgression before we'd lose our job? CBS has played the "kind and compassionate" boss for years now, but the fact of the matter is, Sheen's cons finally outweighed his pros, and at this point, they're probably thinking they can swap him out for another actor.

It might seem like arrogance that Sheen has said the show won't survive without him, but what other message would you get from the fact that not only have they not fired him, but they've actually given him raises.

I won't say I feel bad for Sheen, because I don't. It's hard to feel bad for someone who is worth more money even without a job than I'll ever be worth in my entire life, but I refuse to keep one finger pointed squarely at him.

Nowhere but in the entertainment industry would this sort of behavior be tolerated. Maybe we should be less focused on Charlie Sheen, and worry more about the fact that we all knew what was going on, and some of us chose to sit back on our couches and enjoy the show.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making