Skip to main content

Gas and Obama

You're going to die when you read my next sentence.

Really, call 9-1-1, because this is going to send you into a proverbial tizzy.

(I don't know if that's the right expression, I've just always wanted to say "proverbial tizzy.")

I saw a segment on Fox News that I actually--gasp--agree with.

Hear me out.

There was a segment about rising gas prices, and how nobody's on Obama's case about it even though when costs were as high during the Bush administration, there were endless news stories about how this was another notable failure during his Presidency.

Now, obviously, whenever you talk about the news, you sadly have to factor in spin, but here are the facts:

~ Gas is as high as it was when it peaked during the Bush administration.
~ It's true that people don't seem as concerned, and if they are, it's certainly not being reported as much.
~ I haven't heard Obama say anything on the subject.
~ The prices don't seem to be hitting a ceiling. They seem to be going even further up.

So what's the deal?

I have no idea.

All I know is that I do think it's only fair to make as much noise about it now as we did when Bush was in office. I realize that gas is a limited resource, and there's only a certain amount we can do about the fact that we can't rely on it forever, but regardless of that, we attached it to President Bush as one of his screw-ups, and now it's occurring again.

So maybe we need to make sure it's at least acknowledged by the current administration that gas prices are out of control.

The reporter on Fox News said--"What's good for the goose is good for the gander."

I have to agree with the blowhard moron.

Please Mr. President, make sure this doesn't happen too often.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making