Skip to main content

When Art Needs to Earn Your Attention

I have reached the end of my rope with The Walking Dead.

It has become yet another AMC show to decide that spending hours upon hours with no plot or character development is totally acceptable, as long as you tell the viewers to keep "investing."

Well, guess what?

I'm not investing anymore.

Not without a good reason.

The Killing had everybody "investing" and then they didn't even clear up the season-long mystery during the season finale.

Sorry, but once bitten, twice shy.

I don't expect every episode of a television show to be gold, but I do expect plot progression over the course of the season, especially when a season is only ten to thirteen episodes long.

Instead, I see what appears to be a lot of writers with two episodes worth of plot trying to stretch it out all season (I'm looking at you, Ryan Murphy).

Every time you complain that a movie or a television is boring, people say that we've lost our collective attention spans as a society.

That's true, but that doesn't excuse a piece of art from dragging.

Art still needs to be necessary. What's happening now is that art needs to be more necessary, more relevant, and more riveting--and I'm not sure that's a bad thing.

There's so much to read, view, experience that we don't want to waste time, and because in most instances, you can't tell if your "investment" is going to pay off or not, you just don't bother at all.

I don't think that makes anybody a cultural caveman.

Shows like Lost managed to be interesting throughout most of their run and still carry a story over the course of multiple seasons.

And yet other shows struggle with this, and then hide behind what appears to be artistic acting and directing, when really it's just killing for time.

The person in charge of all these "reflective" episodes of The Walking Dead needs to realize that if I wanted to meditate, I'd take a yoga class. I watch shows about zombies because I want to be enthralled.

If this show can't give it to me, I know plenty others that can.

Maybe our attention spans haven't shortened. Maybe there's just so much more to pay attention to.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making