Skip to main content

Whitney

I could be wrong, but despite how popular Rhianna may be, I doubt that twenty years from now, anyone will be saying that they remember where they were the first time they heard "Rude Boy."

Although both "Rude Boy" and a song like "Didn't We Almost Have It All" may both be considered pop songs, only one of them is the song my parents refer to as "their divorce song."

A lot of singers give people break-up songs, and fall in love songs, but to give someone a divorce song?

That's saying something.

Her songs encapsulate experiences in a way that other songs don't.

And here's why she deserves so much credit:

The songs aren't all that good.

Think about "How Will I Know?" sung by anybody else--especially one of the singers around these days. Not to date myself, or sound like an old crony, but I doubt Miley Cyrus could make that song sound as joyful as Whitney did.

I'm not trying to take anything away from the writers or composers of a song, but clearly a singer has something special in them, when they can make the National Anthem a number one hit hundreds of years after it was written.

Anybody who doubts how hard a song it is needs only to watch recent incarnations to understand the magnitude of that achievement.

As sad as it is to say, Whitney had trouble evolving with the times. To me, she was always at her best in the eighties when pop could be as dramatic and jubilant as possible. When it wasn't just about sex and scandal.

The cool, laid-back "My Love is Your Love" Whitney had hits, but to me, she just wasn't the same as that young girl with the big hair singing about dancing with somebody who loves her.

That's how I'll remember her.

Marking time for everybody's life, making sense out of the worst divorce I've ever seen, and adding so much to songs that, on the surface, seem so frivolous.

She made pop music seem important.

I'm not sure there's a higher compliment to give than that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making