Skip to main content

A Healthcare Blog from Someone Lucky Enough to Have Healthcare

I like something Colin Powell says about information.

"Tell me what you know, then tell me what you don't know. Only then can you tell me what you think."

Well, I know I have Healthcare. I know I'm lucky because I have Healthcare. I know that if I get sick, I'm covered and that I am able to keep myself healthy even in some preventive ways due to the fact that I have Healthcare.

I don't know much about the new plans for universal Healthcare. I don't follow up on every pro and con that is tossed out into the media by both parties. I have not read the exhaustive comprehensive plan.

That's what I know and what I don't know.

Here's what I think.

I think that other countries have proven that universal healthcare works, at least to the extend that their entire infrastructure hasn't fallen apart by implementing it. Are things perfect? I'm sure they're not, but things are much farther from perfect here then they seem in Canada as far as the Heathcare system goes.

I think that if a country has the capabilities and opportunities to help people who are sick and need medical attention and doesn't do so because of paperwork, policy, business, or greed, that country is in trouble. I'm actually going to use the objective "right" and "wrong" here. A country that can help people who need it and doesn't is in a country that is wrong. Notice that I'm not saying Republicans, Democrats, the North, the South, the red states, the blue states, you or me. I'm saying the country. All of us. We're wrong if we don't do something to fix this.

I think that somewhere there must be parents whose children are either sick or dying and can't get medical attention because of the way the system is now. I don't know the unimaginable depths of frustration and helplessness those parents must feel, but I think that it's ridiculous for a situation like that to exist in a country where people spend thousands upon thousands of dollars on meaningless garbage on a daily basis. If that makes me sound like a socialist, so be it. I think any parent would memorize Marx in a heartbeat if it meant getting their child help when they needed it.

I think that doing something is better than doing nothing. The Healthcare system is not getting better; it is getting worse in that it is not changing and it's never been any good. At least in the past, if you had a full-time job, you most likely had Healthcare. That is not the case now, and it is going to get worse. Healthcare is expensive so less and less employers are offering it regardless of how much their company is making. I think that my children and my grandchildren are going to have a much, much harder time getting Heatlhcare than I did if things don't change.

I think most senior citizens who oppose universal Healthcare are being very selfish in all this. I think people who are on Medicare and protest "government intervention" should not even be listened to. I don't believe an opinion is valid if it is an ignorant opinion. Not an uneducated opinion obviously, since that's what I and most of the country have, but an ignorant opinion based on selfish motives.

I think that the people on the right who oppose universal Healthcare are doing it for motives other than what they are admitting to. I believe their scare tactics are only convincing people who want to be scared anyway. I think we should force this issue whether or not everyone is coming along on the ride. The right got to have a war that didn't make sense and a President who was rash and destructive for eight years. I think that anyone who says things were better in 2008 than they were during the Clinton years is lying and knows they're lying.

Most of all, I think I'd rather be the generation that acted--that did something. If it doesn't work, I can stand behind saying 'My country tried, and we failed, but we really did try' than 'We let it stay the way it was knowing it wasn't working and hoping our kids would fix it.'

That's what I think.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making