Skip to main content

Top Chef Rant of the Night

Warning: Spoilers, Spoilers, and More Spoilers

Well, it was Restaurant Wars tonight, and as usual, I'm infuriated.

The show finally thought of doing away with having the teams be responsible for the decor, but they still had one of the chefs do front of house. What doing front of house has to do with being a chef is beyond me.

It seems like even they're aware of how it's become the death card, but they still make someone do it.

Okay, here's the spoiler:

Laurine got sent home.

I know, not much of a spoiler.

She's so blase it's amazing she's made it this far. Robin is more annoying and less talented, but at least she fights to stay in the game. Laurine has dropped such gems as "I guess I forgot about the competition."

WHAT?

Still, I didn't think she deserved to get kicked off. Her team's loss was completely Jen's fault.

First, Jen didn't think to split up the Voltaggios. Why on earth would you let the Voltaggios team up against you in any scenario? That was mistake one.

Mistake two was deciding to do that many entrees on a menu. There was nothing interesting about their line-up. It was too heavy-handed.

Then Jen completely fell apart in the kitchen.

Oh wait, she does that every episode.

Sometimes it results in great food, but it never stops being incredibly frustrating to watch. She's an embarrassment to women in the kitchen. She's like the cliche of what chauvinists would imagine a woman chef is like, and it's awful.

So many times during tonight's episode I screamed at her--"PULL IT TOGETHER!" I don't care who she studies under, she should have been kicked off tonight.

They say with each round that they don't take into consideration past challenges, until times like these when clearly Laurine had to go simply because Jen's better television.

I don't think Laurine necessarily deserved to stay on, but they should do away with having someone do front of house. It has nothing to do with the food.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making