Skip to main content

Why Can Khloe Kardashian Get Married, But I Can't?

I blame People magazine.

A few years ago, when Jennifer Lopez married Marc Anthony, they had her on their cover in a white wedding dress and photos of the ceremony being presided over by a priest.

It was all very lovely, until you considered the fact that Jennifer Lopez had been married before--and not just once either.

Apparently, the Catholic church is totally fine with people getting married multiple times as long as they're famous, rich, or both.

They're just not all right with two men getting married.

And People magazine doesn't have the guts to ask J.Lo how exactly she figured she could walk down the aisle in a white dress for the THIRD TIME.

It's hard to imagine that California can vote down gay marriage, and yet, when Khloe decided to marry someone she'd known for mere weeks, nobody said anything.

Nobody came out to protest. Nobody claimed that the sanctity of marriage was being compromised, or used for publicity. No representatives from any church said that this shouldn't happen because a marriage should be between two people who were going to spend the rest of their lives together, which these two, I think it's safe to say, are not.

Now, I like Khloe. I have no problem with her getting married. And since I already think having a piece of paper to say that you love someone is silly, I don't really have a problem with two people who barely know each other getting married and the media making it out to be a fairy tale.

But if straight people can the silly pieces of paper, and if they're helping to make them seem silly by allowing these frivolous unions to happen and then lauding them, why can't I have one of my own?

Just sayin'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making