Skip to main content

Teachers and Bullying

Nine Massachusetts students made news this week when they were charged in connection to the suicide of a girl they have been accused of bullying.

The argument is that what went on with this particular student went above and beyond normal bullying. Some news sites have actually used the words "torture" and "torment."

From what I've read, it doesn't seem like "torture" is an appropriate word, but then again, those of us who remember high school know that being locked in a building with people who hate you five days a week can sometimes feel like the equivalent of a prison sentence in Turkey.

Now, principals are required to call in law enforcement when they see bullying happen.

Here's a better idea:

Why don't principals and teachers just do their jobs to make sure this doesn't happen?

Anytime I saw bullying, both in junior high and senior high, the teachers were well-aware that it was going on. I saw some teachers who wouldn't tolerate it at all, and others who looked the other way.

In the Massachusetts case, people are saying that faculty members knew about the bullying and were not consistent in trying to prevent it.

I realize it's difficult to stop something like this with the onslaught of social networking, but at the very least, they should try to make sure it doesn't happen on school grounds during school hours.

The problem is that students--girl students especially--have learned to circumvent the disciplinary system in schools by not physically assaulting anyone, but rather, by emotionally and mentally destroying them.

(Mean Girls wasn't THAT far-fetched.)

It's almost as if the Girl Bully as an animal has learned to evolve over the years to protect itself from school expulsion.

That means teachers and administration need to expand the definition of what they consider "bullying."

Anytime it seems like there's a grey area when it comes to disciplining students (and by "grey area" I mean, an area where effort is required) administrators seem to take the "not my problem" approach.

I would consider anything that actively disrupts another student's education with malicious intent bullying.

I think, for the time being, there needs to be a zero tolerance policy enforced in schools when it comes bullying. There's simply no way for a teacher/principal to know whether or not the first time they witness a kid being bullied is the actual first time or the fiftieth.

No, this will not stop bullying altogether, but it can least take it down a few notches.

I think kids are going to experience some kind bullying before they leave school, and to hope they won't is naive. That being said, if drug use goes up in schools, there's a response, or there should be. Everybody agrees on that.

We all acknowledge that when there's a problem plaguing kids in school, it needs to be dealt with urgency and intensity.

Hopefully this incident will bring about that kind of a response.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making