Skip to main content

Writing Every Day

Today there was an article posted on CNN about a guy who has written a song every day for over a year, and plans to keep doing so until he's 80.

Now, as you might expect, these songs aren't exactly 'Yesterday' material.

Most of them are cute little songs, and a few are quite good.

This pretty much proves the golf theory--if you hit a hundred golf balls in a row, even if you'd never played golf before, one of them would be the perfect swing.

Just like anything else, writing is an exercise. The more you do it, the better you get at it.

The more you produce, the better chance that something you've written will be terrific.

Of course, along the way, you write a lot of junk.

I think that's why more people who are interested in writing don't do it.

They sit down. They write something lousy. They give up.

When I started writing, I didn't care if what I wrote was lousy, because I considered myself an actor. If what I wrote was bad, oh well. I wasn't a writer anyway, was I?

Now that I consider myself a writer, I still don't particularly care if what I write on a daily basis is any good.

I just know that I have to do it in order to write something worthwhile.

A few people have told me that they want to write, but when they tell me their ideas, it's usually--

"This big sprawling work about our generation and the future and Tibetan monks."

In other words, a really ambitious piece they're never going to write, because their own ideas overwhelm them.

I'd say start small.

Do what song-a-day guy is doing. Do what I do.

Write a little piece a day, and when you're ready, move onto something bigger.

It's fulfilling to see that you can complete something in a short amount of time, even if it's something small.

I've been working on a full-length, and I still write smaller pieces every day.

To me, it's like stretching before a run.

There is an exception to the "more you produce" rule, of course.

It's called James Patterson.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making