Skip to main content

The Great School Vacation Debate

It happened every year.

My mom and my aunt would get into an argument because my aunt was going to take my two cousins on vacation.  The issue was never where she was going or how much she was spending.  The issue was always that my aunt would take my cousins out of school a week before Christmas vacation began.

Some of you with children may recognize this as one of the great parental divides.  Those, like my aunt, who add extra vacation time to their children's school year by taking them out of school early or adding time onto their vacation, and those, like my mother, who believe these people should have their children away by social services.

Both sides obviously make compelling arguments.

My mom would argue that three weeks of vacation during the year, plus holidays, plus summer vacation, is more than enough time without having to remove kids from school thereby setting them back in regards to their schoolwork.

My aunt would counter that if you go on vacation when everybody else does, you end up with traffic on the road, high prices on air travel, and crowds everywhere.

My mom would then counter with her favorite word:  Tough.  Then she would tell my aunt that she sounded like a spoiled brat for thinking she should be exempt from what all of us go through on vacations, and that her kids were going to turn out the same way if she wasn't careful.

From that point on, there would just be lots of swearing, hanging up, calling back, more swearing, crying, and ultimately (thankfully) forgiveness...

...Until the following year.

It isn't just my mom and aunt either.  I notice when I'm around mothers and the talk turns to vacations, you see the lines become drawn once someone mentions giving their kids that extra week.

"Well, I suppose I could do that as well, but I don't want my son ending up homeless and addicted to heroin."

"Ah well then, you have fun standing in line for three hours after driving two days to get to Disney World only to realize you have to drive back immediately so your little Johnny doesn't miss his quiz on plant cells."

It makes me feel good that I won't have to make any sort of decision about this for a long while.

Since it is Christmas time though, and since vacations are going to start approaching, I wondered where I would stand on the issue.

I can definitely see my aunt's points.  Plus, it seems like another example of overparenting to be that hypersensitive about your kids missing the week before or after vacation--especially when anybody's who has been to school knows that those weeks are usually wasted anyway.  I went to a great school and I used to spend the week before Christmas watching movies in all my classes and doing busy work.  Lastly, I very much enjoy disagreeing with my mother.

That being said, ultimately, I'd have to side with my mom.  It does seem like the extra time kids and their parents feel that they're entitled to have a better vacation than the rest of us.  If everybody did follow their lead, they'd have no reason to take the extra time.  Basically, they're counting on everybody else following the rules so that when they break them, it's a bigger payoff.  Crowds and traffic are small hassles, and for those bigger vacations where more than a week is required, there's that season called summer.

But if I'm being truthful about why I'd side with my mom, it's this:

If you're the kid that gets extra vacation, that means you're the kid all the other kids hate while they're taking that pop quiz on plant cells.

And I wouldn't want that for my kid just so we could have a shorter wait in line to get on a roller coaster somewhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making