Skip to main content

The Two Letter Technique

There's a story I love about a leader who arrives on the first day of his new job to find two letters from his predecessor.

He is told to open the letters only when there is an emergency.

When the first emergency occurs, the leader opens up the first letter. It says--

"Blame everything on me."

So the leader blames his predecessor and everything is fine.

When the second emergency occurs, the leader opens up the second letter. It says--

"Sit down and write two letters."

The story is funny, but not all that absurd.

The Two Letter Technique has become perfected at a time when voters are fickle. In go the Democrats to fix what the Republicans have broken, and out go the same Democrats when they fail to make an impact.

All the politicians seem to agree on is one thing:

It was the fault of the person before me.

This does not exist purely on a high level of government. If anything, it seems worse the farther down you go. All the shake-ups in the last election have led to an awful lot of First Letter opening fairly early in the game.

What I find amazing, however, is that despite the blame game, nobody ever seems to be prosecuted or even investigated for their alleged indiscretions.

In the town I live in, there were allegations made by the current mayor against the former mayor that ranged from felonious incompetency to embezzlement to taking bribes. Yet the former mayor was never even questioned about any of this, and he ended up dying a few years later.

So did the current mayor not believe that his predecessor was really responsible for the mess he inherited? Is it just a mess that's been passed on from administration to administration? Was he just employing the first part of the Two Letter Technique?

Either way, nobody comes away from it looking good. The previous leader is shamed and the current leader is either a liar or too scared to prosecute his/her predecessor--and why? Because there's a sort of protection amongst politicians? A blood brotherhood that prevents them from doing anymore than smearing each other's good name?

As I said, so many people are opening up their first letter early in the game. It makes me wonder what happens once their second letter is opened and they're still less than halfway through their term?

Somehow the joke doesn't seem that funny anymore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making