Skip to main content

How New Work Might Help You

I tend to really love this time of year. It's always exciting when theaters start announcing their seasons for the upcoming year.

What astounds me, however, is how little imagination seems to be presenting itself lately in some of the chosen seasons.

Mostly, theaters seem to want to fight over what was new and hot from New York, or in some cases, new and cold.

It doesn't seem to matter if a show was successful on the Great White Way, as long as it made it there in the first place. Sometimes I wonder if producers don't push some shows to Broadway simply because it'll guarantee it a longer life on the regional circuit.

It's surprising to me that these theaters don't look at some of the trends occurring in New York and try to replicate them--namely, taking a chance on new talent.

We might brand New York and Broadway as mainstream disappointment, but the fact is, a lot of risks are taken there--especially on new, exciting work.

So then why don't we try to take risks on local talent?

Instead of fighting over some tried-and-true Tony winner, why not try to find the next great play? There's no rule that says masterpieces can only come out of New York. In fact, shows like Anna in the Tropics and August: Osage County originated outside of New York.

Any theater that commits at least part of its season to finding a fresh new voice in its own community may just stumble across a show that could have a life long after their season is finished.

Although we offer act as if by producing new work we're doing the playwright and the work itself a favor, the truth is, with the right eye, new work could end up working for you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making