Skip to main content

And What's Your Plan for Season Two?

When I thought about writing something about how producers and writers of various television shows plan poorly for success, I started writing down a list of shows with concepts that couldn't possibly extend past three hour-long episodes, let alone an entire season, and then I ran out of paper, ink, and sanity.

Honestly, when you think about what it takes to get a television show on the air, it amazes me that some of these shows made it past a basic Q&A with network executives.

Remember that Romeo and Juliet inspired show on Fox where Juliet's Dad ran an adult film company and Romeo's Dad was the police chief or some awful bullshit like that?  The show was cancelled after about half a season despite lots of advance buzz and pretty decent reviews, so nobody could figure out what didn't work.

Here's what didn't work:

Romeo and Juliet is a three-hour play and these bozos expected us to believe it could be stretched out over the course of years.

YEARS.

I mean, that is the game plan, right?  When you create a television show, like anything else, you're aiming for a big hit that'll run for many, many seasons, correct?

So why would you create a show that couldn't possibly extend beyond twenty episodes at best when you're going to be expected to produce more than that every...single...year?

Granted, some producers only have to come up with thirteen episodes if they're on cable, and yes, some show creators have shortened game plans that involve telling a story over the course of a certain number of pre-determined seasons, and then finishing with their artistic dignity intact.

But aside from the two shows where that theory actually applies, what about all the other shows that litter the television landscape that have absolutely no plan in place?

It's almost like the motto is--

Well, if we're a hit, then we'll figure out what we're going to do.

That's how you wind up with shows like Jericho and Revenge, that have great first seasons only to run out of steam because it seems like even their own creators didn't anticipate them making it past one season.

(Believe me, nobody likes Revenge more than I do, but I think even the most diehard fan would have to admit that this show has a shorter shelf life than egg salad on the counter in the middle of July.)

Again, I ask--how did this clear all the hurdles it would have to clear to get broadcast to millions of people?

All it would take to get rid of all these shows and prevent future ones from being put in place would be one simple question:

"And what is your plan for Season Two?"

Just think about all the crappy television that would disappear if producers and writers had to answer this question before their show could get on the air.

"Daybreak.  It's basically Groundhog Day, but a thriller.  And Taye Diggs is in it"
"Okay.  And you think you can stretch that out over seven or eight years if it's a hit?"
"Uh, well--"
"Because we're making a big investment here.  This is television.  We're in it for the long haul."
"Right, well, I think there are lots of ideas to explore here."
"Really?"
"Yeah."
"You do know that hit shows do a hundred episodes--easy.  And really successful shows do at least a hundred and fifty so--"
"Maybe I should try AMC instead."

When you think about it, it makes sense that an industry run by men has trouble thinking for the long-term.  If women ran Hollywood, shit like The Event or whatever that awful show on NBC was called--would never happen.  Yes, men have been responsible for some brilliant things as well, but most of the time, it just seems like flukes that ended up paying off.

(Think about how wrong Lost could have gone.  I mean, Lost could have gone REALLY wrong.)

I applaud the fact that we're living in an era where people like something other than procedurals.  Where attention has to be paid, and if it is, it's rewarded.  Where stories are hatched over numerous episodes and not just popped out in an hour like toaster's strudel, but all this requires real work on the part of the people making these shows--and sometimes, it's pretty evident, the work just isn't there.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back and watch Breaking Bad from the beginning.  The perfect example of a show that probably could have gone on for years, but decided to go out on top instead.

That, my friends, is television done right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making