Skip to main content

Is This Just Who I Am?

I wrote a post last month about resolutions and how I may have taken on too many.

Now I'm wondering if any sort of resolution would just be fruitless at this point.  Maybe it's because I'm nearing thirty, but I'm wondering if there are just aspects of who I am that are never going to change.

For instance, is it too late for me to become a jazz appreciation expert?  To be an expert at anything, you need to dedicate at least five hundred hours of time to it--which never really seemed like that much time to me until it's three in the morning, I haven't cleaned my apartment yet, and the book on the coffee table about John Coltrane seems to be way thicker than it was when I purchased it.

Is it too late for me to learn how to be a cook?  Like, a real cook?  And why isn't there an app called "Here's How You Learn to Cook" where the first step is boiling water instead of Advanced Sauces?

Should I give up on ever playing piano or guitar or bassoon?

(The last one was more because I liked the name when I was five, but still!  It was a dream!)

At what point do you have to look at yourself and ask--Is this just who I am?  And will I always be this way?

Will I always have a bad temper and be slightly impatient?
Will I always overindulge in gossiping?
Will I always be skinny even after eating a large pizza all by myself?

(Please, please, please, please say 'Yes' to the last one.)

Sometimes it feels like it takes all my time and energy just trying to maintain the positive aspects of who I am now.  Of course, the bad habits and negative qualities seem to effortlessly maintain themselves, but I guess that's just how the world works.

Taking on more at times feels like I'm trying to poor water into an already fairly full glass.  That's nto to say that I don't think people can change or improve, it just feels like when I was younger I was a lot more pliable.  I could adapt and learn and memorize and absorb so much more quickly than I can now.

It makes me wonder if I should just quit while I'm ahead.

The question is--Am I ahead?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making