Skip to main content

Why Summer Movies Aren't Selling

This weekend marked a growing trend at the box office this summer--

--Disappointment.

Revenues were once again down from this time last year. Both of the new releases this week--"Killers" with Katherine Heigl and Ashton Kutcher and "Get Him to the Greek"--failed to generate much cash.

This comes after "Sex and the City 2" and "Shrek Forever After" suffered weak openings and in SATC2's case--weak reviews.

Well, to be fair, summer isn't exactly known for producing Oscar-worthy films, but it is supposed to be known for breaking box office records.

So what's going on?

I have a few theories:

1) Things Can't Go Up Forever--Meaning that it's hard to constantly compare how films are doing based on how movies that came out last year did. This week last year "The Hang-over" and "Up" were ruling the box office. Both of those movies were much stronger simply in appearance than either of the two releases that came out this week were. Not to mention that people are feeling a bigger economic hit this year. They're finding cheaper things to do, and now that everything is in 3-D, it's a lot more expensive to go to the movies. So yes, less money is being made, but I think it's still important to acknowledge that money still IS being made, and lots of it. SATC2 is now at $75 million which is exactly where the studios thought it would be at week two. It just didn't make what they expected in its first weekend.

2) It's a lot easier to tell that the movies suck. Based on the trailers alone, you could tell that SATC2 and Shrek 4 had lousy (if any) plots. The lack of attraction between Heigl and Kutcher in "Killers" is palpable even in the posters. For too long, I think the movie industry has assumed that people will go see a lousy summer movie as long as it's a sequel or if it has big enough stars in it, and I think they're going to find if they don't start putting out better products, they're going to see the numbers keep shrinking, especially after a movie's been out for a few weeks.

Now, it's still very premature to call this summer a failure.

For one thing, kids aren't even out of school yet. Still, this doesn't bode well for studios that have been trying to push the summer months back into March so they can have bigger openings by cashing in on everyone's July anticipation when it's still snowing outside.

Maybe that's the root of the problem. Maybe people are starting to feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of movies being thrown at them that they're told they HAVE to see, and maybe, just maybe--

They're not buying it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making