Skip to main content

Glee: Ryan Murphy Shows His Age

Any fan of Nip/Tuck will tell you: Ryan Murphy has a problem with longevity.

The first three seasons of N/T were fantastic, but once the Carver was revealed, everything went downhill.

Okay, you say, so the man had three good years on a show. What's wrong with that?

Well, keep in mind, those three seasons were on cable, which means they only made up about a year and a half worth of network television.

So it's fair to say that there's a good reason to worry about Murphy's biggest hit to date:

Glee.

I could already see the cracks in the facade last season.

I know you Gleeks don't want to hear it, but even you have to admit that by Episode 13, Murphy had finished up most of his storylines and there really wasn't anywhere to go...

...Except down.

The second half of last season was just him stalling for time by doing "special" episodes like the Lady Gaga-fest.

Oh sure, they're fun, but how about a little plot every now and again?

By the end of the season, the game at every Glee party became "Yell out the obvious plot development before the character onscreen reveals it."

The only people surprised by Glee anymore are twelve-year-old girls, but since they're who advertisers cater to the most, nobody's all that upset about it.

The rest of us, however, including the Nip/Tuck fans amongst us, watched tonight's season premiere as if we were watching a familiar trainwreck.

For one thing, Murphy loves to preach. The man never met a soapbox he didn't like. And since he knows he's playing to gay/outcast crowd, almost every Glee episode revolves around acceptance and tolerance.

That's lovely, if not a little boring (we're talking twenty-five hours of television here, give or take) but the problem is most of his characters have now learned to like who they are.

So what does he do?

He creates new characters with identity crises!

Add that to the fact that he has a hard time walking the line between quirkiness and absurdity (David E. Kelley has the same problem. See "Downfall of Every David E. Kelley Show.") and what do you get?

An androgynous female football coach named "Coach Beiste" (pronounced "Beast) looking for a place to sit in the faculty lunchroom.

Coach Beiste's tormenting at the hands of Mr. Schuester and Sue Sylvester (the Emmy-award winning Jane Lynch a.k.a. sometimes the only redeeming factor of the show) became the main plotline, because, you know, when you have twenty-three other episodes to write and all you've got is a glee club gearing up for a SECOND time at regionals, you need to know how to conserve.

Peppered throughout the episode was the introduction of a few new characters including a pretty blonde football player who sings but is ashamed to admit it. (Sound familiar? That's because Glee used the same storyline last year with Cory Monteith's character Finn.)

Actually, at this point, there are so many characters in the Glee universe that it seems like nobody's getting their fair share of time OR a decent storyline. Some characters--like the quirky guidance counselor--didn't even appear in tonight's episode.

(You know you've gone overboard as a writer when you can't make room for main characters in the show's season premiere.)

So many plotlines are being rehashed and redecorated from last year, you'd think this show was in its eighth year instead of its second. Part of that might be because Fox has turned Glee into more than a television show--now it's a brand.

Earlier this year, Fox and Glee's producers had people all over the country uploading embarrassing videos of themselves singing onto Myspace in the hopes of becoming part of Glee's cast. Well, hard as I tried, I couldn't seem to find any of the Myspace stars on tonight's episode. Could the whole thing have been a giant publicity stunt?

Considering all the other publicity surrounding the show, it wouldn't surprise me.

With a tour, singles being released week-to-week, and a Broadway musical in the works, is it any wonder its writers are having trouble coming up with stories for the show itself?

The main couple has already broken up and gotten back together twice. Quinn has gone from being the bitch to the nice pregnant girl to the bitch again. And as for the musical numbers, whereas early in the series they were (mostly) there to help the plot along, now they're just inserted into the episode sporadically with no tie-in between the song's message and what's happening in the story at the time (if there is in fact a story).

Some think Mr. Murphy was a genius for having the Glee kids lose last year at regionals, but what other choice did he have? If they'd won, any dynamic the show would have had would be gone. Regardless of that, if they lose this year, the show will simply start to feel depressing.

In other words, how much longer can he keep this up?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A List of People Who Can Go to Hell Now That I Can't Have Elizabeth Warren

So today was a rough day for everybody who isn't a @#$%-ing #$%hole. Let's just start there. If that upsets you, by all means, go straight to hell. This entire rant is going to be exactly what it sounds like. I am mad and I am going to exercise my right to BLOG ABOUT IT LIKE IT'S 1995, SO BUCKLE UP, BUTTERCUP. I really don't even know where to start, so let's just jump right in with the first person who comes to mind. Bloomberg, go to hell.  You really didn't have anything specific to do with today, but you can just go to hell for spending an ungodly amount of money on literally nothing.  I mean, you could have lit millions of dollars on fire and at least warmed the hands of the homeless, but instead, you made tv stations across the country that are already owned by Conservatives rich, so kudos to you and go to hell. Amy Klobuchar, I STUCK UP FOR YOU AMY.  I got into FIGHTS on SOCIAL MEDIA while DEFENDING your sorry, self-interested ass.  You know

Theater and the Outbreak

After last week's interview, a representative from a theater that recently experienced the results of opening too soon reached out to speak with me. I want to thank this person for coming forward in the hopes that it'll change some minds about what's safe and what isn't when it comes to the performing arts. Here's the interview: ME:  So this wasn't a full production or-- THEM:  No. It was us trying to do a little something for friends and donors. ME:  Who is 'us?' THEM:  The board of _____. ME:  And how long have you been on the board? THEM:  Three years. ME:  What was this going to be? THEM:  There's a, uh, beautiful park here in town, and we wanted to do an outdoor performance of a Shakespeare as a benefit, because, as you know, theaters are having a hard time right now paying the bills. We checked with the local government and the health department for the state to make sure we were doing everything the way we needed to in order to keep everyone s

People You Know Are More Important Than People You Don't Know

This post is in response to arguing with people--straight and gay alike--about a certain celebrity, whether or not she's an ally, if she's pandering, if pandering matters, and whether or not I'm an asshole. The last part is probably an enthusiastic "Yes" but let's reflect on this for a bit anyway without actually giving more time to an argument about a person none of us know, which is a crucial part of what I want to talk about. People you know are more important than people you don't know. I realize it's tricky in an age where we've never been closer or more engaged to our celebrities to keep in mind that we do not know them, they are not our friends, and while we may love them and stan and feel like we're attacked when they're attacked-- That is not true. That is not real. They are in no tangible way connected to us. Now, as someone who is obsessed with pop culture, I get that it's a little hypocritical for me to be making